In our backyard: Keeyask and the legacy of hydroelectric development, By AiméeCraft and JillBlakley, University of Manitoba Press, Winnipeg, 2022, 440 pp., paperback $31.95 (ISBN 978‐0887552885)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
a comprehensive look at hydropower development in northern Manitoba, broken down into four parts covering difference aspects of hydroelectric development: evolution, impacts, partnership building, and legacy building.With 15 chapters and over 20 authors, it is an extensive review of the Keeyask project in an industry that continues to struggle with its legacy of social, economic, and environmental outcomes on the Indigenous peoples whose lives and livelihoods have been permanently altered by hydropower development.These outcomes include lack of consultation on hydropower projects, flooding of traditional hunting territories and sacred grounds, displacement and loss of homes due to dam and reservoir creation, and water pollution and environmental contamination.The editors plant the seeds of expectation for positive change at the beginning of the book and take the reader through the many complex and varied issues involved with hydroelectric development, which in Canada fall disproportionately on Indigenous peoples because of their proximity to these water resources.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".