Python script fuzzy time series Markov chain model for forecasting the number of diseases cocoa plant in Bendungan district
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cocoa is a plantation commodity whose role is essential for the economy, so it is necessary to be aware of its health to maximize production. Cocoa plant disease data is a time series data because it is observed continuously. One of the time series forecasting models is the Fuzzy Time Series Markov Chain (FTS-MC), a combination of the Fuzzy Time Series (FTS) and Markov Chain models. The model uses the principle of fuzzy logic by transferring FTS data to fuzzy logic and using the obtained fuzzy logic groups to derive the Markov chain transition matrix. In this research, a Python script of the FTS-MC model was built in the Google Colaboratory to forecast the number of cocoa plant diseases in Bendungan District to simplify and speed up the data processing. Python was used in this research because of its easy-to-use, flexible, and open-source syntax. In building Python scripts, libraries and functions are needed by utilizing loop processes and if-else statements. Based on the processing results, forecasting with the FTS-MC model using Python only takes less than 1 minute.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".