Artificial intelligence and entrepreneurship education: A paradigm in Qatari higher education institutions after covid-19 pandemic
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The spread of the Covid-19 pandemic and the interruption of personal communication between the teacher and students in higher education led to the need for finding solutions that enable the continuation of the educational process and ensure access to accurate information that improves the level of human capital in dealing with dynamic environments. Therefore, this research sought to analyse the impact of the application of artificial intelligence in entrepreneurship education in Qatari higher education institutions after the Corona pandemic. The measurement of artificial intelligence was based on dimensions (machine learning, natural language processing, expert systems, and machine vision), while entrepreneurship education was measured by dimensions of (entrepreneurial cognition, entrepreneurial competence, and innovation spirit). The research followed an experimental quantitative approach based on collecting data from Qatari university students using a questionnaire developed for the research purpose. Hence, the convenience sample used in the research was composed of 402 students from various Qatari universities, which represents a response rate of 67% from the distributed questionnaires. The statistical analysis of the research data was based on the covariance-based structural equation modeling technique (CB-SEM). The results of the research indicated that all dimensions of artificial intelligence had a positive impact on entrepreneurial education, with the highest impact being machine vision and the lowest impact being natural language processing. Accordingly, the results of the research revealed the need to invest in technological capabilities for supporting the educational system aimed at generating innovative human resources capable of coping with the uncertainty of the work environment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".