MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4360778752 · doi:10.22514/jomh.2023.024

A survey study to determine health disparities among men who have sex with men in Eastern Ontario: looking beyond sexual risk and the gay, urban core

2023· article· en· W4360778752 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Men s Health · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicLGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMen who have sex with menSexual orientationGerontologyDemographyRecreationRural areaPopulationReproductive healthMedicineSexual minorityHomosexualityPsychologyHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Environmental healthFamily medicineSociologyPolitical scienceSocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To create health promotion programs and clinical guidelines inclusive of gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (gbMSM), a better understanding of the health and social determinants that influence health outcomes for these men is required. Health research on gbMSM, however, has focused primarily on sexual health and HIV (human immunodeficiency virus) with most information coming from men living in large urban centers. To address this limitation and better characterize the overall health of this population, we conducted a survey of gbMSM living in Eastern Ontario, Canada. The survey, completed anonymously, was available from June to October 2015. A total of 674 gbMSM completed the survey; 61% were urban, 23% suburban and 16% lived in small towns or rural settings. The average age was 44.2 years, ranging from 18 to 83 years. Healthcare engagement was high for all groups of gbMSM, though disclosure of sexual orientation to healthcare providers varied based on the gender of sexual partners. Urban men tended to be younger, sexually active only with men, open about their sexual orientation, and more likely to use recreational drugs while men living in small towns and rural settings tended to be older, bisexual and more likely to conceal their sexual orientation. While the physical health of respondents was on par with national averages for men, we found younger men were more likely to suffer from anxiety and use recreational drugs while older men were more likely to develop problem alcohol use. Depressive symptoms were high across all demographic groups. Our data demonstrate that while gbMSM in Eastern Ontario have a high degree of contact with the healthcare system, considerable health inequities remain unaddressed. We also find significant health differences among gbMSM depending on age, area of residence, and degree of disclosure of sexual orientation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.101

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Men s HealthSame topicLGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyFrench-language works237,207