Gene-metabolite annotation with shortest reactional distance enhances metabolite genome-wide association studies results
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Studies combining metabolomics and genetics, known as metabolite genome-wide association studies (mGWAS), have provided valuable insights into our understanding of the genetic control of metabolite levels. However, the biological interpretation of these associations remains challenging due to a lack of existing tools to annotate mGWAS gene-metabolite pairs beyond the use of conservative statistical significance threshold. Here, we computed the shortest reactional distance (SRD) based on the curated knowledge of the KEGG database to explore its utility in enhancing the biological interpretation of results from three independent mGWAS, including a case study on sickle cell disease patients. Results show that, in reported mGWAS pairs, there is an excess of small SRD values and that SRD values and p-values significantly correlate, even beyond the standard conservative thresholds. The added-value of SRD annotation is shown for identification of potential false negative hits, exemplified by the finding of gene-metabolite associations with SRD ≤1 that did not reach standard genome-wide significance cut-off. The wider use of this statistic as an mGWAS annotation would prevent the exclusion of biologically relevant associations and can also identify errors or gaps in current metabolic pathway databases. Our findings highlight the SRD metric as an objective, quantitative and easy-to-compute annotation for gene-metabolite pairs that can be used to integrate statistical evidence to biological networks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".