MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4360816717 · doi:10.1021/jacs.3c01942

A Crystalline Monomeric Phosphaborene

2023· article· en· W4360816717 on OpenAlexafffund
Etienne A. LaPierre, Brian O. Patrick, Ian Manners

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicOrganoboron and organosilicon chemistry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsUniversity of Victoria
KeywordsChemistrySteric effectsBond orderDouble bondMonomerReactivity (psychology)Bent bondTriple bondSingle bondCrystallographyBond lengthComputational chemistrySextuple bondBond strengthCharacter (mathematics)StereochemistryCrystal structureOrganic chemistryGroup (periodic table)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report the synthesis of the monomeric phosphaborene Ar*P═B(TMP) ( 2 ) (Ar* = 2,6-bis(triisopropylphenyl)-3,5-diisopropylphenyl) containing 2-coordinate phosphorus and boron centers. Compound 2 has a PB bond length of 1.741(3) Å, the shortest reported to date. Computational examination of the bonding in 2 reveals, in addition to the σ bond, the presence of a single classical π bond and a large Wiberg bond index of 1.9707, consistent with double bond, and not triple bond, character. The chemistry of 2 is marked by its low reactivity, which is rationalized by examination of the frontier molecular orbitals and steric considerations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical SocietySame topicOrganoboron and organosilicon chemistryFrench-language works237,207