The Lived Experiences of Street Children in the Province of Cebu
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The study focused on the Lived Experiences of Street Children in the Province of Cebu.The study utilized the hermeneutic phenomenological research design. Moreover, the participants of the study are the ten (10) street children of Cebu Province selected using the purposive sampling method. Data Saturation was the basis for determining the number of participants in the study.To analyze the data, the researcher made use of Collaizi’s method. It is a unique seven-step methodology that offers a thorough examination, with each stage remaining true to the facts.Moreover, the study yielded four themes namely; (1) Basic Needs, (2) Dropping out of School, (3) Irresponsible Parents, (4) Health,and (5) aspiration. In addition, the study determined that everyday struggles are faced by street children in the Province of Cebu. Fulfilling fundamental needs, such as food, clothing, and a place to sleep is a challenge. Likewise, they have also missed out on the possibility to enroll in school, losing out on the ability to better their lives. Moreover, these children suffer from the sad situation of having negligent parents who fail to provide their basic necessities. Despite all of these setbacks, these children still want to succeed in life.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it