MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4360826123 · doi:10.1007/s12600-023-01070-1

Reduction in productivity of soybean plants infested with Neohyadatothrips variabilis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) with and without soybean vein necrosis virus

2023· article· en· W4360826123 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Doris Lagos‐Kutz, Michelle L. Pawlowski, Jae-Yeong Han, Steven J. Clough, G. L. Hartman

Bibliographic record

VenuePhytoparasitica · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAgricultural Research ServiceUnited Soybean BoardU.S. Department of Agriculture
KeywordsBiologyThripidaeThripsInfestationPEST analysisHorticultureAgronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Soybean thrips, Neohyadatothrips variabilis (Beach), a vector of Soybean Vein Necrosis Virus (SVNV), has been recognized as a widespread pest of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] in USA and Canada. Several experiments investigated the effect on soybean when infested with soybean thrips with and without SVNV. Experiment 1 compared soybean infested at V1 and V5 growth stages (GS) with soybean thrips without SVNV and noninfested plants. For plants infested at GS V1, plant height, number of seeds, and seed weights were reduced by 50, 80, and 75%, respectively. When plants were infested at GSs V1 and V5, the counts of soybean thrips peaked at 1,803 and 4,214 per plant 4 weeks after infestation (WAI), respectively. Experiment 2 used SVNV-infected soybean thrips and compared soybean infested versus control at GS V1 and V5. For plants infested at GS V1, plant height was reduced 77.8%, and plants died before setting pods. For plants infested at GS V5, height, number of seeds, and seed weights were reduced 56, 78, and 92%, respectively. When plants were infested at GSs V1 and V5, the counts of soybean thrips peaked at 282 and 883 per plant 2 WAI, respectively. Experiment 3, five soybean genotypes were infested with SVNV-infected thrips at GS V1. Number and weight of seeds per plant were higher and with lower visual disease ratings (progressive chlorosis, necrosis and rugosity) for the more resistant genotypes Merschman Kennedy and plant introduction (PI) 171451 than for the more susceptible genotypes: soybean breeding line LD12-12734a (Rag1/2), cv Williamsfield Illini 3509N, and PI 417136.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhytoparasiticaSame topicPlant Virus Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207