MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4360842192 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2715882/v1

Measuring severe obesity in pediatrics: A cohort study

2023· preprint· en· W4360842192 on OpenAlexaffabout
Geoff D.C. Ball, Atul Sharma, Sarah A. Moore, Daniel L. Metzger, Doug Klein, Katherine M. Morrison

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicObesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityUniversity of British ColumbiaDalhousie UniversityUniversity of ManitobaUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePercentileBody mass indexReceiver operating characteristicIntraclass correlationAnthropometryDyslipidemiaCohortObesityOverweightDemographyPediatricsGerontologyInternal medicineStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Purpose: To examine cross-sectional and longitudinal relationships between body mass index (BMI)-derived metrics for measuring severe obesity (SO) using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and World Health Organization (WHO) references and cardiometabolic risk factors in children and adolescents. Methods: In this cohort study completed from 2013 to 2021, we examined data from 3- to 18-year-olds enrolled in the CANadian Pediatric Weight management Registry. Anthropometric data were used to create nine BMI-derived metrics based on the CDC and WHO references. Cardiometabolic risk factors were examined, including dysglycemia, dyslipidemia, and elevated blood pressure. Analyses included intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and receiver operator characteristic area-under-the-curve (ROC AUC). Results: Our sample included 1,288 participants (n=666 [51.7%] girls; n=874 [67.9%] white), with SO of 59.9–67.0%. ICCs revealed high tracking (0.90–0.94) for most BMI-derived metrics. ROC AUC analyses showed CDC and WHO metrics discriminated the presence of cardiometabolic risk factors, which improved with increasing numbers of risk factors. Overall, most BMI-derived metrics rated poorly in identifying presence of cardiometabolic risk factors. Conclusion: CDC BMI percent of the 95th percentile and WHO BMIz performed similarly as measures of SO, suggesting both can be used for clinical care and research in pediatrics. The latter definition may be particularly useful for clinicians and researchers from countries that recommend using the WHO growth reference.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.140
GPT teacher head0.408
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Square→Same topicObesity, Physical Activity, Diet→French-language works237,207→