Clarifying the Configuration of Pandamine by an Extensive Spectroscopic Reinvestigation of the Authentic 1964 Sample
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Since its partial configurational assignment in 1964, pandamine has not been isolated or obtained by total synthesis. For decades, different works representing the structure of pandamine for illustrative purposes have lent different configurations to this molecule, causing tenacious confusion about the structure of this ansapeptide. A comprehensive spectroscopic analysis of the authentic pandamine sample led to the complete and unambiguous assignment of its configuration, 59 years after its isolation. In addition to ascertaining and completing the initial structural deductions by a state-of-the-art set of analytical techniques, the purpose of this study is also to clarify the literature in a context in which various erroneous structures have been attributed to pandamine for half a century. While fully in agreement with Goutarel's conclusions, the specific example of pandamine should serve as a cautionary tale to any chemist interested in natural products, encouraging access to initial structural assignments rather than relying solely on subsequent, possibly erroneous, structure depictions of a natural product.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".