La bibliothèque publique au prisme du vécu des publics et des non-publics : une institution culturelle en mutation?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article s’intéresse au vécu des publics et des non-publics de la bibliothèque Marc-Favreau à Montréal. L’analyse révèle des divergences dans les rapports tout autant que dans les perceptions à l’égard de la bibliothèque. Tant les publics que les non-publics laissent voir des positionnements originaux sur un continuum liant ses aspects documentaires, qui sont associés à une conception traditionnelle, à ses aspects communautaires, qui renvoient à une conception contemporaine. Ce faisant, le texte pointe la prévalence d’une perspective traditionnelle, tout en proposant une compréhension située de la dimension communautaire. Des tensions sont repérées entre ces aspects, interrogeant les aspirations institutionnelles de la bibliothèque « pour tous ».
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".