MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4360851778 · doi:10.1364/jocn.483130

Scalable filterless coherent point-to-multipoint metro network architecture

2023· article· en· W4360851778 on OpenAlexaff
Carlos Castro, Antonio Napoli, Mario Porrega, Johan Bäck, Amir Rashidinejad, Marco Quagliotti, Emilio Riccardi, D. Hillerkuss, Amin Yekani, Fady Masoud, A. Mathur, João Pedro, Bernhard Spinnler, Sezer Erkılınç, Aaron Chase, Tobias A. Eriksson, Dave Welch

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Optical Communications and Networking · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsInfineon Technologies (Canada)
FundersHorizon 2020 Framework Programme
KeywordsSubcarrierScalabilityComputer scienceFlexibility (engineering)TelecommunicationsPoint-to-pointIntersection (aeronautics)Transmission (telecommunications)Software deploymentComputer networkCore networkOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Metro aggregation is one of the fastest growing segments in telecommunications in terms of data traffic. At the intersection of core and access, where coherent modules compete with direct detection technology, high capacity must be provided at low cost and low power, with enhanced scalability and flexibility. Real-life Telecom Italia Mobile metro aggregation networks are examined and their design and planning optimized. The analysis is supported by techno-economics, which compares two coherent solutions: traditional point-to-point (P2P) and digital subcarrier (DSC)-based coherent modules for P2P and point-to-multipoint transmission. We demonstrate that the greater flexibility of DSC-based coherent modules leads to significant cost savings over a three-phase network deployment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Optical Communications and NetworkingSame topicOptical Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207