Adaptive Fuzzy Boundary Observer Design for Uncertain Linear Coupled Hyperbolic Partial Differential Equation Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Joint uncertainties and state estimation of a class of linear coupled hyperbolic partial differential equation systems in the presence of unstructured and structured uncertainties are studied in this paper. For unstructured uncertainties which are completely unknown, by employing Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy logic system to approximate the unstructured uncertainties, a novel adaptive fuzzy boundary observer is developed to estimate both unknown system states as well as unknown weights in the fuzzy logic system, and the estimation errors are ultimately bounded. Therein, in the design of the proposed observer, a set of swapping filters and infinite dimensional backstepping technique are combined. On the other hand, for structured uncertainties that can be described in a concrete parameterized form, the proposed method can easily achieve the exact estimation of weights and states to their true values. The rigorous proof is provided to show that the ultimately bounded estimation errors for the case of unstructured uncertainties and the exponential convergent estimation errors for the case of structured uncertainties can be realized. Finally, three illustrative simulations are carried out to show the feasibility and effectiveness of the developed methods in this paper.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".