MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4360976471 · doi:10.1093/g3journal/jkad071

Design and validation of a high-density single nucleotide polymorphism array for the Eastern oyster (<i>Crassostrea virginica</i>)

2023· article· en· W4360976471 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Amanda Xuereb, Rodrigo Marín-Nahuelpi, Éric Normandeau, Charles Babin, Martin Laporte, André L. Mallet, José M. Yáñez, Martin D. Mallet, Louis Bernatchez

Bibliographic record

VenueG3 Genes Genomes Genetics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Canadian institutionsMinistère de l’Environnement, de la Lutte contre les changements climatiques, de la Faune et des ParcsMinistère des Ressources naturelles et des ForêtsUniversité Laval
FundersGenome AtlanticMitacsGenome CanadaUniversité Laval
KeywordsBiologyLinkage disequilibriumSingle-nucleotide polymorphismGeneticsCrassostreaSNP genotypingGenotypingMendelian inheritanceEvolutionary biologyOysterFisheryGenotypeGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dense single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays are essential tools for rapid high-throughput genotyping for many genetic analyses, including genomic selection and high-resolution population genomic assessments. We present a high-density (200 K) SNP array developed for the Eastern oyster (Crassostrea virginica), which is a species of significant aquaculture production and restoration efforts throughout its native range. SNP discovery was performed using low-coverage whole-genome sequencing of 435 F1 oysters from families from 11 founder populations in New Brunswick, Canada. An Affymetrix Axiom Custom array was created with 219,447 SNPs meeting stringent selection criteria and validated by genotyping more than 4,000 oysters across 2 generations. In total, 144,570 SNPs had a call rate >90%, most of which (96%) were polymorphic and were distributed across the Eastern oyster reference genome, with similar levels of genetic diversity observed in both generations. Linkage disequilibrium was low (maximum r2 ∼0.32) and decayed moderately with increasing distance between SNP pairs. Taking advantage of our intergenerational data set, we quantified Mendelian inheritance errors to validate SNP selection. Although most of SNPs exhibited low Mendelian inheritance error rates overall, with 72% of called SNPs having an error rate of <1%, many loci had elevated Mendelian inheritance error rates, potentially indicating the presence of null alleles. This SNP panel provides a necessary tool to enable routine application of genomic approaches, including genomic selection, in C. virginica selective breeding programs. As demand for production increases, this resource will be essential for accelerating production and sustaining the Canadian oyster aquaculture industry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.205
Threshold uncertainty score0.800

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueG3 Genes Genomes GeneticsSame topicGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestockFrench-language works237,207