MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4360989136 · doi:10.18280/ria.370115

Machine Learning Algorithm and GESTOSIS Score Assisted High Risk Pregnancy Induced Hypertension Prediction

2023· article· en· W4360989136 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jagruti Meshram, Seeta Devi, Gaikwad Sachin Ramnath, Lily Podder, R Harikrishnan

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue d intelligence artificielle · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPregnancyComputer sciencePreeclampsiaMachine learningHigh risk pregnancyArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This GESTOSIS scale is a validated tool which aids in predicting high risk women for Pregnancy-Induced Hypertension (PIH).This study aimed to use machine learning algorithms to determine the efficacy of the GESTOSIS score in predicting PIH.A prospective observational study was conducted on 70 pregnant women.The features in GESTOSIS scale classified as mild, moderate, or severe.The results showed that the Adaptive Boosting (AB) model precisely predicts the PIH with an accuracy range between 97% to 99% based on the results of regression and classification prediction models respectively with a true -positive rate (TPR) of 90%.The GESTOSIS score is concluded to be a simple scale that can be administered by all front-line health workers in the community without intrusive procedures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.937
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.185
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue d intelligence artificielleSame topicArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207