Anaerobic Microbial Activity May Affect Development and Sustainability of End-Pit Lakes: A Laboratory Study of Biogeochemical Aspects of Oil Sands Mine Tailings
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reclamation of fluid fine tailings (FFT) produced by mined oil sands ore processing is an environmental and technical challenge. End-pit lakes (EPLs) are a prospective reclamation strategy needing comprehensive evaluation. We investigated biogeochemical changes in water quality and sediments by using 140 L columns containing 50 L of FFT, either unamended or amended with hydrocarbons, and capped with 20 L of process water to simulate an EPL. The columns were incubated up to 3 years anaerobically at 10, 20, or 30 °C. Microbial metabolism of hydrocarbons in FFT produced methane (CH 4 ) and carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), accelerated FFT settling by expressing more porewater to the surface, and increased turbidity in cap water. Gas ebullition caused bitumen release and chemical flux from the underlying FFT to cap water. Dissolution and biotransformation of carbonate and Fe-bearing minerals in FFT during incubation led to the positive flux of major cations (Ca 2+ and Mg 2+ ), anions (HCO 3 – ), and some trace elements (primarily Ba and Sr), thereby influencing the chemistry of overlying cap water. No discernible trend in flux of dissolved organic carbon and naphthenic acids was observed. The results suggest that microbial anaerobic activity stimulated by residual hydrocarbons in FFT may influence the progression of EPLs into viable aquatic ecosystems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".