Tensor Recurrent Neural Network With Differential Privacy
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recurrent neural network (RNN), a branch of deep learning, is a powerful model for sequential data that has outstanding performance on a wide range of important Internet of Things (IoT) tasks. This unprecedented growth of RNN model has however encountered both heterogeneous IoT data and privacy issues. Existing RNN model can not deal with heterogeneous sequential data; often the larger datasets used in training of RNN model contain sensitive information. To tackle these challenges and for the first time, this research proposes a novel differentially private tensor-based RNN (DPTRNN) that can be applied in many challenging deep learning sequence tasks for IoT systems. Specifically, to process heterogeneous sequential data, we propose a tensor-based RNN model. To guarantee privacy, we develop a tensor-based back-propagation through time algorithm with perturbation to avoid exposing the sensitive information for training the tensor-based RNN model within the framework of differential privacy. Thorough security analysis shows that the differential private tensor-based RNN efficiently protects the confidentiality of sensitive user information for IoT. Our results from extensive experiments on two challenging large video datasets suggest that our proposed scheme is practical with guarantee of data privacy preservation and acceptable accuracy loss.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.012 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it