MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4360995371 · doi:10.1109/tsp.2023.3260561

Joint Optimization of Transmit Beamforming and Base Station Cache Allocation in Multi-Cell C-RAN

2023· article· en· W4360995371 on OpenAlexafffund
Mehran Esmaeili, Shahram Shahbazpanahi, Min Dong

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBeamformingCacheComputer scienceBackhaul (telecommunications)Optimization problemBase stationTelecommunications linkMathematical optimizationConvex optimizationComputer networkAlgorithmTelecommunicationsMathematicsRegular polygon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper studies a downlink cloud radio access network (C-RAN) consisting of a centralized processor (CP) and multiple cells each one of which has one cache-enabled base station (BS) connected to the CP through wireless backhaul links. In such a network, we aim to determine sizes of the cache allocated to the BSs such that the long-term delivery time of the available files is minimized. Considering the two-stage nature of this problem, we formulate a beamforming optimization problem and a cache allocation problem. The purpose of the first one is to deliver un-cached portions of files to the BSs in the shortest possible time during the beamforming stage. The second problem aims to minimize long-term expectation of delivery time through optimal cache allocation during the cache allocation stage. We rigorously prove that the <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">time-varying beamformers</i> can be assumed to be piece-wise constant functions of time. Based on this finding, the beamforming optimization problem does not appear to be amenable to a computationally efficient solution. Hence, we resort to the zero-forcing (ZF) beamforming approach to tackle the beamforming optimization problem. Using the results of the beamforming optimization problem, we prove that the cache allocation problem is a convex optimization problem; hence it can be solved by any convex optimization solvers. Simulation results show that the loss of optimality due to adopting ZF beamforming is negligible. Moreover, the superiority of our proposed cache allocation scheme over several other heuristic schemes including proportional cache size allocation is shown.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.940
Threshold uncertainty score0.737

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Signal ProcessingSame topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207