MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4360996408 · doi:10.3103/s0025654422080039

Exact Solution to the Contact Problem in a Quarter-Plane of a Multilayer Medium by the Universal Simulation Method

2022· article· en· W4360996408 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
В. А. Бабешко, О. В. Евдокимова, О. М. Бабешко

Bibliographic record

VenueMechanics of Solids · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical stress and fatigue analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Plane (geometry)Exact solutions in general relativityMathematicsMathematical analysisComputer scienceCalculus (dental)GeometryMedicineGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this paper, for the first time, an exact solution to the contact problem posed on the surface of a multilayer medium in a quarter-plane is constructed. This is achieved by applying a new universal modeling method developed for studying and solving boundary value problems for partial differential equations. In this paper, the method is applied to two-dimensional Wiener–Hopf integral equations in the quarter-plane arising in mixed problems of deformable solid mechanics, in contact problems. A feature of mixed problems for layered media is the presence of meromorphic functions in Fourier transformations of the kernels of integral equations. As in differential equations, this made it possible to find fragments of differential equations in the representation of Wiener–Hopf integral equations and to find a way to reduce a two-dimensional integral equation to one-dimensional. This makes it possible to reduce integral equations in this field to infinite systems of linear algebraic equations having an inverse infinite matrix. This type of integral equations is not available for numerical solution, due to the unlimited scope of the equation, and has not been studied analytically before. The exact solution to the two-dimensional Wiener–Hopf equation in a quarter-plane makes it possible to construct high-precision solutions to contact problems in limited domains, just like in the one-dimensional case. Wiener–Hopf integral equations are widely used in various fields for materials with complex rheology, including strength theory, diffraction, flaw detection, and tribology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.970
Threshold uncertainty score0.268

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMechanics of SolidsSame topicMechanical stress and fatigue analysisFrench-language works237,207