MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

IDSM: Intent-Driven Slice Management and Maintenance for 6G RANs

2022· article· en· W4360996555 on OpenAlexaff
Jingwen Zhang, Chungang Yang, Alagan Anpalagan, Ru Dong, Lulu Zhang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkNetwork management stationNetwork managementSoftware-defined networkingApplication lifecycle managementWireless networkKey (lock)AbstractionNetwork elementNetwork architectureDistributed computingWirelessSoftwareTelecommunicationsOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The next-generation wireless communication networks need to support various vertical industries and emerging use cases, with diverse services making the network architecture increasingly complex. Network slicing enables service-oriented management and maintenance by dividing the infrastructure into multiple logical networks to meet diverse and stringent requirements. However, faced with a large tenant base and personalized slicing requirements, network slice providers should put significant effort to complete the lifecycle management of the slices, which severely hinders the implementation of the large-scale end-to-end sliced network. Intent-driven network (IDN) can be used to reduce the complexity of management and maintenance for 6G Radio Access Networks (RANs) by automating the configuration and operation of managed networks with a high-level abstraction of intent. Therefore, we present the framework of Intent-driven Slice Management and Maintenance for 6G RANs, which is termed as IDSM. Firstly, we describe its architecture, followed by the three key technologies of intent translation, slice generation, and Deep Q Network (DQN) intent maintenance. Finally, OpenAirInterface (OAI) platform and FlexRAN Software-Defined-Network (SDN) controller with DQN are used to demonstrate the presented IDSM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.692
Threshold uncertainty score0.331

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207