MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4361005572 · doi:10.3389/fmars.2023.1126704

Vertical distribution of pH in the top ~10 m of deep-ocean sediments: Analysis of a unique dataset

2023· article· en· W4361005572 on OpenAlexafffund
Changgao Shao, Danling Tang, Louis Legendre, Yi Sui, Hongbin Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Marine Science · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine Biology and Ecology Research
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueDalhousie UniversitySouthern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou)Chinese Academy of SciencesNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsDiagenesisSedimentGeologyTotal organic carbonOceanographyWater columnDiffusionMineralogyGeomorphologyEnvironmental chemistryChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We analyze, for the first time in the oceanographic literature, pH over the top ~10 m of the sediment (down to 11.9 m) in a deep-sea environment, together with the oxidation/reduction potential and concentrations of solid organic carbon (OC) and CaCO 3 . A total of 1157 sediment cores were collected from years 2000 to 2011 over >300,000 km 2 in the South China Sea, at water depths up to 3702 m. We found that there were marked downward pH increases in the upper 2 m of the sediment (first 20-40 ka, corresponding to the geochemically active period). In deeper, older sediment (up to 200 ka), pH was generally less variable with depth but not uniform, and solid OC may have been consumed down to ≥10 m depth. This reflected interactions between in situ geochemical diagenetic processes, which tended to create vertical variations, and vertical diffusion of ions, which tended to even out vertical variability. In other words, there were slow diagenetic geochemical processes in the sediment layer below 2 m, and the effects of these in situ processes were partly offset by vertical diffusion. Overall, our study identified a previously unknown consistent pH difference between the upper 2 m of the sediment and the underlying layer down to ≥10 m, and suggested combinations of geochemical diagenetic processes and vertical diffusion of ions in the porewater to explain it. These results provide a framework for further studies of pH in the top multi-meter layer of the sediment in the World Ocean.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.549

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Marine ScienceSame topicMarine Biology and Ecology ResearchFrench-language works237,207