MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4361005697 · doi:10.17811/ebl.12.1.2023.1-9

Editorial Note

2023· editorial· en· W4361005697 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Francisco J. Delgado, Eduardo González

Bibliographic record

VenueEconomics and Business Letters · 2023
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLegal Cases and Commentary
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversidade de VigoSyddansk UniversitetUniversidad Carlos III de MadridUniversitat de BarcelonaUniversità di BolognaPrinceton UniversityUniversità degli Studi Roma TreUniversità BocconiQueen Mary University of LondonUniversity of DundeeWest Virginia UniversityUniversity of ConnecticutWestern Michigan UniversityInstitut National de la Recherche AgronomiqueLondon School of Economics and Political ScienceUniversidad de OviedoMcMaster UniversityUniversity of MacedoniaUniversitat de GironaGeorge Washington University
KeywordsEconomicsKeynesian economics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Editorial Note

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.111
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.114
Threshold uncertainty score0.381

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.111
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.003
Bibliometrics0.0070.003
Science and technology studies0.0090.003
Scholarly communication0.0170.004
Open science0.0050.003
Research integrity0.0270.023
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1140.087

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEconomics and Business LettersSame topicLegal Cases and CommentaryFrench-language works237,207