MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4361009571 · doi:10.3390/s23073477

Event-Triggered Sliding Mode Neural Network Controller Design for Heterogeneous Multi-Agent Systems

2023· article· en· W4361009571 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSensors · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Zhejiang ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsRobustness (evolution)Control theory (sociology)Computer scienceArtificial neural networkRobust controlMulti-agent systemProtocol (science)Controller (irrigation)ConsensusSliding mode controlUpper and lower boundsControl systemControl (management)EngineeringArtificial intelligenceNonlinear systemMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A class of heterogeneous second-order multi-agent consensus problems is studied, in which an event-triggered method is used to improve the feasibility of the control protocol. The sliding mode control method is used to achieve the robustness of the system. A special type of general radial basis function neural network is applied to estimate the uncertainties. The event-triggered mechanism is introduced to reduce the update frequency of the controller and the communication frequency among the agents. Zeno behavior is avoided by ensuring a lower bound between two adjacent trigger instants. Finally, the simulation results are provided to demonstrate that the time evolution of consensus errors eventually approaches zero. The consensus of multi-agent systems is achieved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.957
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it