Osmoregulatory Performance among Prickly Sculpin (<i>Cottus asper</i>) Living in Contrasting Osmotic Habitats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
During the colonization of freshwater by marine fish, adaptation to hypoosmotic conditions may impact their ability to osmoregulate in seawater. The prickly sculpin (Cottus asper) is a euryhaline fish with marine ancestors that postglacially colonized many freshwater habitats. Previous work on C. asper suggested that isolation in freshwater habitats has resulted in putative adaptations that improve ion regulation in freshwater populations compared with populations with current access to estuaries. To determine whether long-term colonization of freshwater is associated with a reduced ability to ion regulate in seawater, we acclimated C. asper populations from three habitat types that vary in the extent to which they are isolated from marine habitats and compared their seawater osmoregulation. Seawater acclimation revealed that lake populations exhibited a reduced capacity to osmoregulate in seawater compared with coastal river populations with ongoing access to estuaries. In particular, when acclimated to seawater for several weeks, lake populations had lower gill Na+/K+-ATPase activity and lower intestinal H+-ATPase activity than coastal river populations. Lake populations also had a reduced ability to maintain plasma ion concentrations, and they produced lower quantities of intestinal carbonate precipitates in seawater than coastal river populations. Furthermore, there was a positive relationship between the anterior intestinal Na+/K+-ATPase activity and the amount of precipitate produced by the intestine, which suggests that the anterior intestine plays a role in seawater osmoregulation. Our results suggest that the extent of isolation from the sea could, in part, explain the reduced osmoregulation in seawater in postglacial freshwater populations of C. asper.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".