Discrete separation of patients’ profiles for chronical obstructive pulmonary disease context-aware healthcare efficient systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
According to the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC), the symptoms of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are shortness of breath, coughing, and sputum production. Many studies estimate that COPD will become the third-leading cause of death worldwide by 2030 (WHO,2008). Pervasive healthcare systems cover healthcare issues, including chronic diseases; they help patients to manage their own health information and healthcare services at any time and in any place. We developed a COPD healthcare system based on a combination of the parameters of patients. The main goal is to avoid the severe phases of the disease by monitoring them. This combination of risk factors provides in total 600 profiles from data, with 88.5% accuracy. However, many studies have focused on and shown the issues of the effectiveness and accuracy of these systems. The problem is to i apply a new classification model to detect the severe phases of the disease early. Therefore, Instead of working on COPD parameters, we design and validate a profile-based classification model of patients. This model will facilitate the building of a rule-based framework. In addition, the accuracy of our extended COPD system is improved using the classification and separation of patients’ profiles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".