Self‐Curable Synaptic Ferroelectric FET Arrays for Neuromorphic Convolutional Neural Network
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the recently increasing prevalence of deep learning, both academia and industry exhibit substantial interest in neuromorphic computing, which mimics the functional and structural features of the human brain. To realize neuromorphic computing, an energy-efficient and reliable artificial synapse must be developed. In this study, the synaptic ferroelectric field-effect-transistor (FeFET) array is fabricated as a component of a neuromorphic convolutional neural network. Beyond the single transistor level, the long-term potentiation and depression of synaptic weights are achieved at the array level, and a successful program-inhibiting operation is demonstrated in the synaptic array, achieving a learning accuracy of 79.84% on the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CIFAR)-10 dataset. Furthermore, an efficient self-curing method is proposed to improve the endurance of the FeFET array by tenfold, utilizing the punch-through current inherent to the device. Low-frequency noise spectroscopy is employed to quantitatively evaluate the curing efficiency of the proposed self-curing method. The results of this study provide a method to fabricate and operate reliable synaptic FeFET arrays, thereby paving the way for further development of ferroelectric-based neuromorphic computing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".