MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4361210165 · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acba17

The IXPE View of GRB 221009A

2023· article· en· W4361210165 on OpenAlexaff
Michela Negro, Niccolò Di Lalla, N. Omodei, P. Vereš, Stefano Silvestri, Alberto Manfreda, Eric Burns, L. Baldini, E. Costa, Steven R. Ehlert, J. A. Kennea, Ioannis Liodakis, Herman L. Marshall, S. Mereghetti, R. Middei, Fabio Muleri, Stephen L. O’Dell, O. J. Roberts, Roger W. Romani, C. Sgró, Masanobu Terashima, A. Tiengo, Domenico Viscolo, Alessandro Di Marco, Fabio La Monaca, L. Latronico, G. Matt, M. Perri, Simonetta Puccetti, Juri Poutanen, Ajay Ratheesh, Daniele Rogantini, Patrick Slane, P. Soffitta, E. Lindfors, K. Nilsson, Anni Kasikov, Alan P. Marscher, F. Tavecchio, Nicolò Cibrario, Shuichi Gunji, Christian Malacaria, A. Paggi, Yi-Jung Yang, Silvia Zane, Martin C. Weisskopf, I. Agudo, L. A. Antonelli, Matteo Bachetti, W. H. Baumgartner, R. Bellazzini, S. Bianchi, Stephen D. Bongiorno, R. Bonino, A. Brez, N. Bucciantini, Fiamma Capitanio, Simone Castellano, E. Cavazzuti, Chien‐Ting Chen, S. Ciprini, Alessandra De Rosa, E. Del Monte, Laura Di Gesu, I. Donnarumma, Victor Doroshenko, Michal Dovčiak, Teruaki Enoto, Y. Evangelista, Sergio Fabiani, Riccardo Ferrazzoli, Javier A. García, Kiyoshi Hayashida, Jeremy Heyl, W. Iwakiri, S. G. Jorstad, P. Kaaret, V. Karas, Fabian Kislat, Takao Kitaguchi, Jeffery J. Kolodziejczak, H. Krawczynski, S. Maldera, Frédéric Marin, Andrea Marinucci, Ikuyuki Mitsuishi, Tsunefumi Mizuno, C.‐Y. Ng, C. Oppedisano, Alessandro Papitto, George G. Pavlov, Abel L. Peirson, M. Pesce-Rollins, Pierre-Olivier Petrucci, M. Pilia, Andrea Possenti, Brian D. Ramsey, John Rankin, G. Spandre, Douglas A. Swartz, Toru Tamagawa, Roberto Taverna, Yuzuru Tawara, Allyn F. Tennant, Nicholas E. Thomas, Francesco Tombesi, A. Trois, Sergey S. Tsygankov, Jacco Vink, Kinwah Wu, Fei Xie

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal Letters · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersInstituto de Astrofísica de CanariasIstituto Nazionale di Fisica NucleareStockholms UniversitetTurun YliopistoGoddard Space Flight CenterUniversitetet i OsloNational Science FoundationAgenzia Spaziale ItalianaInstituto de Astrofísica de AndalucíaMarshall Space Flight CenterHáskóli ÍslandsIstituto Nazionale di AstrofisicaNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationAarhus Universitet
KeywordsAfterglowGamma-ray burstPhysicsAstrophysicsPolarization (electrochemistry)HaloAstronomyGalaxyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We present the IXPE observation of GRB 221009A, which includes upper limits on the linear polarization degree of both prompt and afterglow emission in the soft X-ray energy band. GRB 221009A is an exceptionally bright gamma-ray burst (GRB) that reached Earth on 2022 October 9 after traveling through the dust of the Milky Way. The Imaging X-ray Polarimetry Explorer (IXPE) pointed at GRB 221009A on October 11 to observe, for the first time, the 2–8 keV X-ray polarization of a GRB afterglow. We set an upper limit to the polarization degree of the afterglow emission of 13.8% at a 99% confidence level. This result provides constraints on the jet opening angle and the viewing angle of the GRB, or alternatively, other properties of the emission region. Additionally, IXPE captured halo-rings of dust-scattered photons that are echoes of the GRB prompt emission. The 99% confidence level upper limit to the prompt polarization degree depends on the background model assumption, and it ranges between ∼55% and ∼82%. This single IXPE pointing provides both the first assessment of X-ray polarization of a GRB afterglow and the first GRB study with polarization observations of both the prompt and afterglow phases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal LettersSame topicGamma-ray bursts and supernovaeFrench-language works237,207