Inhibition of the beta-1 adrenergic receptor does not potentiate mirabegron-stimulated human brown adipose tissue thermogenesis.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pharmacological stimulation of human brown adipose tissue (BAT) has been hindered by either ineffective activation or undesirable off-target secondary effects. Oral administration of the maximal allowable dose of mirabegron (200 mg), a β3-adrenergic receptor (β3-AR) agonist, has been effective in stimulating BAT thermogenesis and whole-body energy expenditure. However, this too has been accompanied by undesirable cardiovascular effects. Combining mirabegron with a cardio-selective β1-AR antagonist could not only suppress these unwanted effects, but potentially increase the sensitivity of the β3-AR and β2-AR in WAT and BAT. Here we report that co-ingesting a high dose of the β1-AR antagonist bisoprolol with mirabegron suppresses the increase in heart rate, systolic blood pressure and myocardial oxygen consumption. However, it also blunted the mirabegron-stimulated increase in BAT lipolysis, thermogenesis and glucose uptake. Whether the attenuation in BAT blood flow induced by the large dose of bisoprolol limited BAT thermogenesis remains to be determined. Clinical Trial Registration ID #: NCT04823442
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".