MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4361216702 · doi:10.1080/02626667.2023.2195558

Spatiotemporal variability of minimum runoff generating areas: a field investigation

2023· article· en· W4361216702 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Kishor Panjabi, Ramesh Rudra, Rituraj Shukla, Narayan Kumar Shrestha, Pradeep Goel, Prasad Daggupati, Bahram Gharabaghi

Bibliographic record

VenueHydrological Sciences Journal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Canadian institutionsMinistry of the Environment, Conservation and ParksUniversity of Guelph
FundersMinistry of Agriculture, Food and Rural AffairsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinistère de l’Environnement, de la Protection de la nature et des ParcsOntario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs
KeywordsSurface runoffEnvironmental scienceWatershedHydrology (agriculture)Water contentStructural basinSpring (device)Drainage basinGeographyGeologyCartographyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Past studies described several dominant factors responsible for minimum runoff-generating areas (MRGAs) which are seldom backed by field observations. Here, soil moisture and runoff data for 45 rainfall events were collected from a small (21.62 ha) agricultural watershed in Ontario, Canada, using a remotely operated wireless sensor network system. The relationship developed between MRGA and basin moisture index (M) indicated that MRGAs are insensitive up to the threshold M value of 25 cm. A higher M leads to an exponential increase in the MRGA. Various factors (e.g. rainfall amount) affecting the spatiotemporal variability of MRGA were then identified. Statistical analyses (e.g. F-test) indicated a strong seasonal influence and showed that MRGA during spring, summer, and fall seasons was 34.3%, 8.0%, and 13.6%, respectively. The relationship of MRGA with rainfall amount, initial soil moisture content and rainfall intensity was the strongest for the summer season followed by fall and then spring.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.269
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHydrological Sciences JournalSame topicHydrology and Watershed Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207