A Stochastic Weather Model for Drought Derivatives in Arid Regions: A Case Study in Qatar
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we propose a stochastic weather model consisting of temperature, humidity, and precipitation, which is used to calculate a reconnaissance drought index (RDI) in Qatar. The temperature and humidity models include stochastic differential equations and utilize an adjusted Ornstein–Uhlenbeck (O–U) process. For the precipitation model, a first-order Markov chain is used to differentiate between wet and dry days and the precipitation amount on wet days is determined by a probability distribution. Five different probability distributions were statistically tested to obtain an appropriate precipitation amount. The evapotranspiration used in the RDI calculation incorporates crop coefficient values, depends on the growth stages of the crops, and provides a crop-specific and more realistic representation of the drought conditions. Five different evapotranspiration formulations were investigated in order to obtain the most accurate RDI values. The calculated RDI was used to assess the intensity of drought in Doha, Qatar, and could be used for the pricing of financial drought derivatives, a form of weather derivative. These derivatives could be used by agricultural producers to hedge against the economic effects of droughts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".