Changes in Tidal and Barometric Response of Groundwater during Earthquakes—A Review with Recommendations for Better Management of Groundwater Resources
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effects of earthquakes on groundwater and aquifer properties can be quantified and monitored using water-level changes produced by tides and barometric pressure. Tidal and barometric responses are particularly useful in evaluating the impacts of unexpected events, such as earthquakes, because the signals are continuously generated and recorded over large areas of the Earth’s surface. The techniques for the extraction of tidal and barometric signals from the water-level time series are described in many excellent papers, here, we focus on reviewing the hydrogeologic interpretations of, and earthquake impacts on, these responses. We review how hydrogeology and earthquakes impact the groundwater response to Earth tides, and changes in barometric pressure and barometric tides. Next, we review the current understanding of the mechanisms responsible for earthquake-induced changes in aquifer confinement and permeability. We conclude with a summary of open questions and topics for future research, notably the value in long-term monitoring and analysis of the earthquake response at multiple tidal and barometric frequencies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".