MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4361222278 · doi:10.1016/j.ringps.2023.100054

Tectonic development of northeastern part of the Arabian Plate: Examples from Pirmam and Bana Bawi anticlines in the Kurdistan region of north Iraq

2023· article· en· W4361222278 on OpenAlexaff
Ala A. Ghafur, Varoujan K. Sissakian, Nadhir Al‐Ansari, Hassan O. Omer, Hawkar A. Abdulhaq

Bibliographic record

VenueResults in Geophysical Sciences · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicearthquake and tectonic studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnticlineGeologySedimentary depositional environmentAlluvial fanAlluviumSubsidenceTectonicsAlluvial plainFluvialGeomorphologyPaleontologySedimentary rock

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Pirmam and Bana Bawi anticlines are two elongated anticlines located in the central northern part of the Kurdistan Region of north Iraq (KRI), in the northeastern part of the Arabian Plate. We have used satellite images and geological maps to interpret the presented data and to calculate the rates of uplift and down wards (subsidence) amounts, besides estimating the rates of deposition and incision of some alluvial fans and stream terraces. Most of the achieved data were checked in the field. In the Pirmam anticline the rate of the uplift and subsidence is 8.613 mm/ 100 year and 7.962 mm/ 100 year, respectively, whereas in the Bana Bawi anticline the rates are 3.036 mm/ 100 year and 4.365 mm/100 year, respectively. The indications of the lateral growth are the presence of water gaps, wind gaps, en-echelon plunging, whale-back shape and different types of valleys. We have calculated the depositional and incision rates in the Kori and Bastoora streams. They are 5.204 mm/ 100 year and 5.555 mm/ 100 year, respectively in the former, whereas in the latter are 3.469 mm/100 year and 8.731 mm/ 100 year, respectively. Moreover, we have calculated the depositional and incision rates in old and recent alluvial fans. In the former, they are 1.665 mm/ 100 year and 0.722 mm/ 100 year, respectively, whereas in the latter are 3.036 and 4.365 mm/ 100 years, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.126

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResults in Geophysical Sciences→Same topicearthquake and tectonic studies→French-language works237,207→