MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Complete Unitary Qutrit Control in Ultracold Atoms

2023· article· en· W4361225437 on OpenAlexafffund
Joseph Lindon, Arina Tashchilina, Logan Cooke, Lindsay J. LeBlanc

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Applied · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersAlberta InnovatesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsQutritPhysicsQubitQuantum mechanicsHadamard transformQuantum Fourier transformUnitary stateQuantumQuantum gateUltracold atomQuantum logicTopology (electrical circuits)MathematicsCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Physical quantum systems are commonly composed of more than two levels and offer the capacity to encode information in higher-dimensional spaces beyond the qubit, starting with the three-level qutrit. Here, we encode neutral-atom qutrits in an ensemble of ultracold ${}^{87}\mathrm{Rb}$ and demonstrate arbitrary single-qutrit SU(3) gates. We generate a full set of gates using only two resonant microwave tones, including synthesizing a gate that effects a direct coupling between the two disconnected levels in the three-level $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}$-scheme. Using two different gate sets, we implement and characterize the Walsh-Hadamard Fourier transform, and find similar final-state fidelity and purity from both approaches. This work establishes the ultracold neutral-atom qutrit as a promising platform for qutrit-based quantum information processing, extensions to $d$-dimensional qudits, and explorations in multilevel quantum state manipulations with nontrivial geometric phases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review AppliedSame topicCold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein CondensatesFrench-language works237,207