MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4361228367 · doi:10.1101/2023.03.27.534479

Human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived ovarian support cell co-culture improves oocyte maturation <i>in vitro</i> after abbreviated gonadotropin stimulation

2023· preprint· en· W4361228367 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Sabrina Piechota, Maria Marchante, Alexa Giovannini, Bruna Paulsen, Kathryn Potts, Graham Rockwell, Caroline Aschenberger, Alexander D Noblett, Alexandra B Figueroa, Marta Sanchez, Ferran Barrachina, Luis Guzmán, Pedro Belchin, Merrick Pierson Smela, Patrick R.J. Fortuna, Pranam Chatterjee, Nam D. Tran, Dawn A. Kelk, Marcy Forti, Shelby Marcinyshyn, Trozalla Smith, David H. McCulloh, Marta-Julia Fernandez-Gonzalez, Silvia Ortiz, Joshua U. Klein, Peter Klatsky, Daniel Ordonez-Perez, Christian Kramme

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHansjörg Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard UniversityYork UniversityHarvard University
KeywordsIn vitro maturationHuman chorionic gonadotropinOocyteBlastocystAndrologyInduced pluripotent stem cellIn vitro fertilisationBiologyGonadotropinFertility preservationStem cellCell biologyEmbryoFertilityEndocrinologyEmbryogenesisMedicinePopulationEmbryonic stem cellGeneticsHormone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) have significantly impacted fertility treatment worldwide through innovations such as in vitro fertilization (IVF) and in vitro maturation (IVM). IVM holds promise as a technology for fertility treatment in women who cannot or do not wish to undergo conventional controlled ovarian stimulation (COS). However, IVM has historically shown highly variable performance in maturing oocytes and generating oocytes with strong developmental capacity. Furthermore, recently reported novel IVM approaches are limited to use in cycles lacking human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) triggers, which is not standard practice in fertility treatment. We recently reported the development of ovarian support cells (OSCs) generated from human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) that recapitulate dynamic ovarian function in vitro . Here we investigate the potential of the se OSCs in an IVM co-culture system to improve the maturation of human cumulus-enclosed immature oocytes retrieved from abbreviated gonadotropin stimulated cycles. We reveal that OSC-IVM significantly improves maturation rates compared to existing IVM systems. Most importantly, we demonstrate that OSC-assisted IVM oocytes are capable of significantly improving euploid blastocyst formation and yielding blastocysts with normal global and germline differential methylation region methylation profiles, a key marker of their clinical utility. Together, these findings demonstrate a novel approach to IVM with broad applicability to modern ART practice. Structured Abstract Objective To determine if in vitro maturation (IVM) of human oocytes can be improved by co-culture with ovarian support cells (OSCs) derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs). Design Three independent experiments were performed in which oocyte donors were recruited to undergo abbreviated gonadotropin stimulation and retrieved cumulus oocyte complexes (COCs) were randomly allocated between the OSC-IVM and control IVM conditions. Subjects Across the three experiments, a total of 67 oocyte donors aged 19 to 37 years were recruited for retrieval using informed consent. Anti-mullerian hormone (AMH) value, antral follicle count (AFC), age, BMI, and ovarian pathology were used for inclusion and exclusion criteria. Intervention and Control The OSC-IVM culture condition was composed of 100,000 OSCs in suspension culture supplemented with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH), androstenedione and doxycycline. IVM controls comprised commercially-available IVM media without OSCs and contained either the same supplementation as above (media-matched control), or FSH and hCG only (IVM media control). In one experiment, an additional control using fetal ovarian somatic cells (FOSCs) was used with the same cell number and media conditions as in the OSC-IVM. Main Outcome Measures Primary endpoints consisted of metaphase II (MII) formation rate and oocyte morphological quality assessment. A limited cohort of oocytes were utilized for secondary endpoints, consisting of fertilization and blastocyst formation rates with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) and embryo epigenetic analysis. Results OSC-IVM resulted in a statistically significant improvement in MII formation rate compared to the media-matched control, a commercially available IVM media control, and the FOSC-IVM control. Oocyte morphological quality between OSC-IVM and controls did not significantly differ. OSC-IVM displayed a trend towards improved fertilization, cleavage, and blastocyst formation. OSC-IVM showed statistically significant improvement in euploid day 5 or 6 blastocyst formation compared to the commercially available IVM media control. OSC-IVM embryos displayed similar epigenetic global and germline loci profiles compared to conventional stimulation and IVM embryos. Conclusion The novel OSC-IVM platform is an effective tool for maturation of human oocytes obtained from abbreviated gonadotropin stimulation cycles, supporting/inducing robust euploid blastocyst formation. OSC-IVM shows broad utility with different stimulation regimens, including hCG triggered and untriggered oocyte retrieval cycles, making it a highly useful tool for modern fertility treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicReproductive Biology and Fertility→French-language works237,207→