MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4361255976 · doi:10.1016/j.cont.2023.100589

Psychiatric disorders in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms: A systematic review including a subgroup meta-analysis on the association between LUTS and depressive symptoms

2023· review· en· W4361255976 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueContinence · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrinary Bladder and Prostate Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLower urinary tract symptomsMedicinePsycINFONocturiaAnxietyDepression (economics)CINAHLSystematic reviewPsychiatryCochrane LibraryMEDLINEMeta-analysisInternal medicineUrinary systemPsychological interventionCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lower urinary tracts symptoms (LUTS) – voiding symptoms, storage symptoms, or post-micturition symptoms – and psychiatric disorders are often comorbid conditions in patients. However, no systematic review on the association between urological symptoms and psychiatric symptoms in a broad sense had yet been presented. We aim to systematically review the literature on the association of lower urinary tract symptoms with psychiatric symptoms or disorders. This systematic review and meta-analysis is conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. We searched MEDLINE, Embase (Ovid interface), CINAHL and PsycINFO (EBSCO interface) for studies published between database inception and Oct 7th, 2021. The quality of the studies was assessed with Newcastle Ottawa Quality Assessment scale. This review is registered in the PROSPERO register (CRD42021207308). Of 1974 records identified, 77 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. 68 of these had a risk of overall bias of middle or low in the NOS bias assessment scale (Lo et al., 2014; Hamling et al., 2008) [1], [2]. A positive association was found between; LUTS with depression in 31 studies, and with anxiety in 11 studies; OAB with depression in 12 studies, and with anxiety in 13 studies; nocturia with depression in 6 studies; urinary incontinence (both stress and urge) with depression in 13 studies; and voiding dysfunction with depression and anxiety in 7 studies. To our knowledge, this systematic review is the first to research the full range of lower urinary tract symptoms in association with psychiatrics symptoms or disorders. Results show an association between LUTS and psychiatric symptoms in a broad sense, however, most studies report on LUTS in association with depression and anxiety, and less studies report on other psychiatric symptoms or disorders. Further research to specify this will be needed to make a valid statement on specific psychiatric disorders in association with LUTS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.642
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it