MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4361270207 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.107.115173

Effect of spin-orbit coupling on the zero-point renormalization of the electronic band gap in cubic materials: First-principles calculations and generalized Fröhlich model

2023· article· en· W4361270207 on OpenAlexafffund
Véronique Brousseau-Couture, Xavier Gonze, Michel Côté

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B./Physical review. B · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersHorizon 2020Alliance de recherche numérique du CanadaHydro-QuébecFonds Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaEuropean CommissionFonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRSCanada Foundation for InnovationMinistère de l'Économie, de la Science et de l'Innovation - Québec
KeywordsCondensed matter physicsPhysicsBand gapElectronic band structureElectronZero-point energyRenormalizationSemiconductorPolaronSpin–orbit interactionElectronic structureQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The electronic structure of semiconductors and insulators is affected by ionic motion through electron-phonon interaction, yielding temperature-dependent band gap energies and zero-point renormalization (ZPR) at absolute zero temperature. For polar materials, the most significant contribution to the band gap ZPR can be understood in terms of the Fr\"ohlich model, which focuses on the nonadiabatic interaction between an electron and the macroscopic electrical polarization created by a long-wavelength optical longitudinal phonon mode. On the other hand, spin-orbit interaction (SOC) modifies the bare electronic structure, which will, in turn, affect the electron-phonon interaction and the ZPR. We present a comparative investigation of the effect of SOC on the band gap ZPR of twenty semiconductors and insulators with cubic symmetry using first-principles calculations. We observe a SOC-induced decrease of the ZPR, up to 30%, driven by the valence band edge, which almost entirely originates from the modification of the bare electronic eigenenergies and the decrease of the hole effective masses near the $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Gamma}}$ point. We also incorporate SOC into a generalized Fr\"ohlich model, addressing the Dresselhaus splitting which occurs in noncentrosymmetric materials, and confirm that the predominance of nonadiabatic effects on the band gap ZPR of polar materials is unchanged when including SOC. Our generalized Fr\"ohlich model with SOC provides a reliable estimate of the SOC-induced decrease of the polaron formation energy obtained from first principles and brings to light some fundamental subtleties in the numerical evaluation of the effective masses with SOC for noncentrosymmetric materials. We finally warn about a possible breakdown of the parabolic approximation, one of the most fundamental assumptions of the Fr\"ohlich model, within the physically relevant energy range of the Fr\"ohlich interaction for materials with high phonon frequencies treated with SOC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B./Physical review. BSame topicPhysics of Superconductivity and MagnetismFrench-language works237,207