MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4361270271 · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2023.1167817

Corrigendum: Structure-guided design of a potent Clostridioides difficile toxin A inhibitor

2023· erratum· en· W4361270271 on OpenAlexaff
Greg Hussack, Martín A. Rossotti, Henk van Faassen, Tomohiko Murase, Luiz Eugenio, Joseph D. Schrag, Kenneth Ng, Jamshid Tanha

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Microbiology · 2023
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of WindsorNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClostridioidesClostridium difficile toxin AToxinComputational biologyPharmacologyChemistryMicrobiologyBiologyClostridium difficileAntibiotics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1110541.].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.128
Threshold uncertainty score0.427

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0060.002
Research integrity0.0080.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1280.066

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Microbiology→Same topicClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research→French-language works237,207→