In situ Raman spectroscopy and machine learning unveil biomolecular alterations in invasive breast cancer
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SignificanceAs many as 60% of patients with early stage breast cancer undergo breast-conserving surgery. Of those, 20% to 35% need a second surgery because of incomplete resection of the lesions. A technology allowing in situ detection of cancer could reduce re-excision procedure rates and improve patient survival.AimRaman spectroscopy was used to measure the spectral fingerprint of normal breast and cancer tissue ex-vivo. The aim was to build a machine learning model and to identify the biomolecular bands that allow one to detect invasive breast cancer.ApproachThe system was used to interrogate specimens from 20 patients undergoing lumpectomy, mastectomy, or breast reduction surgery. This resulted in 238 ex-vivo measurements spatially registered with standard histology classifying tissue as cancer, normal, or fat. A technique based on support vector machines led to the development of predictive models, and their performance was quantified using a receiver-operating-characteristic analysis.ResultsRaman spectroscopy combined with machine learning detected normal breast from ductal or lobular invasive cancer with a sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 95%. This was achieved using a model based on only two spectral bands, including the peaks associated with C–C stretching of proteins around 940 cm − 1 and the symmetric ring breathing at 1004 cm − 1 associated with phenylalanine.ConclusionsDetection of cancer on the margins of surgically resected breast specimen is feasible with Raman spectroscopy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it