Modelling a Public Administration System for Ensuring Cybersecurity
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The main purpose of the study is to model the process of public administration system for ensuring cybersecurity.The research methodology involves the use of method of decomposition modeling IDEF0 to the achievement of the goals.As a result of the use of this methodology, a model of the implementation of methods and measures of the public administration system was formed in the context of ensuring the cyber security of the information space of its functioning.The use of this methodology made it possible to fully graphically depict the process of achieving the final goal.A significant advantage of this model is the clarity and systematic display of stages, resources and results.The study has limitations, considering that this model was formed for a separate province of Canada, all elements of the model were selected in accordance with the specifics of the public administration of this country, as well as methods for ensuring cybersecurity.In subsequent studies, the authors plan to adapt this model to the realities of other public administration systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it