A Model for Protecting Competitive Advantages in the System for Managing the Innovative Security of an Engineering Enterprise under the Influence of Digitalization of the Economy
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The main purpose is to determine ways to ensure the protection of the competitive advantages of the engineering enterprises innovation security management system.The object of the research is competitive advantages and systems for ensuring their protection for engineering enterprises.The research methodology involves the use of modern graphical modeling techniques to increase the effectiveness of the innovative safety management system in the context of ensuring the protection of competitive advantages.The relevance of the research is added by the fact that at the moment the issue of competitive advantages in ensuring innovative safety of the engineering enterprise is highlighted quite sporadically, mainly in terms of a certain type of competitive advantages.The obtained research results are presented in graphic form and can be used by managers of engineering enterprises.Further research should be devoted not only to ensuring the protection of competitive advantages, but also to the key tools for their development for the engineering sector of the economy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it