MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4361272518 · doi:10.18280/ijsse.130106

Normalized Attention Neural Network with Adaptive Feature Recalibration for Detecting the Unusual Activities Using Video Surveillance Camera

2023· article· en· W4361272518 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Vijay Kumar Damera, Ramesh Vatambeti, M S Mekala, Alok Kumar Pani, Chinthakunta Manjunath

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Safety and Security Engineering · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAnomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeature (linguistics)Computer scienceArtificial intelligenceArtificial neural networkComputer visionPattern recognition (psychology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over the past few years, surveillance cameras have become common in many homes and businesses.Many businesses still employ a human monitor of their cameras, despite the fact that this individual is more probable to miss some anomalous occurrences in the video feeds owing to the inherent limitations of human perception.Numerous scholars have investigated surveillance data and offered several strategies for automatically identifying anomalous occurrences.Therefore, it is important to build a model for identifying unusual occurrences in the live stream from the security cameras.Recognizing potentially dangerous situations automatically so that appropriate action may be taken is crucial and can be of great assistance to law enforcement.In this research work, starting with an MRCNN for feature extraction and AFR for fine-tuning, this architecture has a number of key components (AFR).To increase the quality of the features extracted by the MRCNN, the AFR replicas the inter-dependencies among the features to enhance the quality of the low-and high-frequency features extracted.Then, a normalized attention network (NAN) is used to learn the relationships between channels, which used to identify the violence and speeds up the convergence process for training a perfect.Furthermore, the dataset took real-time security camera feeds from a variety of subjects and situations, as opposed to the hand-crafted datasets utilized in prior efforts.We also demonstrate the method's capability of assigning the correct category to each anomaly by classifying normal and abnormal occurrences.The method divided the information gathered into three primary groups: those in need of fire protection, those experiencing theft or violence, and everyone else.The study applied the proposed approach to the UCF-Crime dataset, where it outperformed other models on the same dataset.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.830
Threshold uncertainty score0.242

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Safety and Security EngineeringSame topicAnomaly Detection Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207