An Introductory Overview of Bessel Polynomials, the Generalized Bessel Polynomials and the q-Bessel Polynomials
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Named essentially after their close relationship with the modified Bessel function Kν(z) of the second kind, which is known also as the Macdonald function (or, with a slightly different definition, the Basset function), the so-called Bessel polynomials yn(x) and the generalized Bessel polynomials yn(x;α,β) stemmed naturally in some systematic investigations of the classical wave equation in spherical polar coordinates. Our main purpose in this invited survey-cum-expository review article is to present an introductory overview of the Bessel polynomials yn(x) and the generalized Bessel polynomials yn(x;α,β) involving the asymmetric parameters α and β. Each of these polynomial systems, as well as their reversed forms θn(x) and θn(x;α,β), has been widely and extensively investigated and applied in the existing literature on the subject. We also briefly consider some recent developments based upon the basic (or quantum or q-) extensions of the Bessel polynomials. Several general families of hypergeometric polynomials, which are actually the truncated or terminating forms of the series representing the generalized hypergeometric function rFs with r symmetric numerator parameters and s symmetric denominator parameters, are also investigated, together with the corresponding basic (or quantum or q-) hypergeometric functions and the basic (or quantum or q-) hypergeometric polynomials associated with rΦs which also involves r symmetric numerator parameters and s symmetric denominator parameters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it