Maternal Exposure to Red Rooibos Does Not Alter Bone Development in Male or Female Sprague-Dawley Rat Offspring
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Maternal diet during pregnancy and/or throughout lactation provides a potential opportunity for nutritional programming of offspring bone development. Objectives of this study were to determine whether maternal consumption of red rooibos (RR) throughout pregnancy and lactation improved bone mineral density (BMD), bone structure, and bone strength in offspring and to determine potential sex-specific responses. Female Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly assigned to control water or RR in water (2600 mg/kg body weight/d) from prepregnancy through to the end of lactation. At weaning, offspring were fed AIN-93G diet until age 3 mo. Longitudinal assessment of the tibia demonstrated that maternal exposure to RR did not alter the trajectory of BMD or bone structure in male or female offspring compared with sex-specific controls at age 1, 2, or 3 mo or bone strength at age 3 mo. In conclusion, maternal exposure to RR did not program bone development in male or female offspring.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".