MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4361276915 · doi:10.5539/ibr.v16n3p52

Changes in Hong Kong's Economic Structure by the New Crown Epidemic and Its Development Trend

2023· article· en· W4361276915 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
CHIU TING YUK

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Business Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicRegional resilience and development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPillarTourismEconomic transformationBusinessSustainable developmentEconomic growthEconomyEconomicsPolitical scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article provides an in-depth analysis of Hong Kong's economic transformation in this COVID-19, using online research and the actual situation in Hong Kong, combined with the characteristics of Hong Kong itself. The four pillar industries of Hong Kong are financial services, tourism, trade and logistics, professional services, and other industrial support services, while in the past the major industrial sectors, except for finance, have encountered bottlenecks in the development of major industries, which have less impact on the development of Hong Kong. The inherent contradictions of our capitalism are becoming increasingly prominent, and our development approach is in urgent need of transformation and upgrading. The violent impact of infectious diseases has caused dramatic changes in the economic structure of Hong Kong. To promote the sustainable development of our economy, it is necessary to improve the rigidity of the industrial structure, reduce the gap between the rich and the poor, and develop an innovative economy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.388
Threshold uncertainty score0.772

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.143
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Business Research→Same topicRegional resilience and development→French-language works237,207→