MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4361278950 · doi:10.1002/gcc.23143

Glioblastoma with novel <scp><i>EGFR</i></scp> mutations (<scp>T790M</scp> and exon 20 insertion) yet unresponsive to osimertinib: A case report

2023· article· en· W4361278950 on OpenAlexaff
Atthaporn Boongird, Nopphon Lekcharoensombat, Artit Jinawath, Talent Theparee, Nutchawan Jittapiromsak, Shanop Shuangshoti, Paul S. Thorner, Chinachote Teerapakpinyo

Bibliographic record

VenueGenes Chromosomes and Cancer · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersChulalongkorn University
KeywordsOsimertinibT790MEpidermal growth factor receptorCancer researchExonMedicineLung cancerBiologyCancerPathologyErlotinibGeneInternal medicineGefitinibGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a high-grade adult-type IDH-wildtype diffuse glioma, commonly harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) amplification. Here, we describe a case of a 49-year-old man with a GBM harboring a TERT promoter mutation. Despite surgical and chemoradiation therapy, the tumor recurred. At that time, comprehensive genomic profiling by next-generation sequencing identified two rare mutations in EGFR: T790M and an exon 20 insertion. Based on these findings, the patient elected to undergo off-label therapy with osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor that has shown promising results in non-small cell lung carcinoma, including metastatic to brain, with exactly the same EGFR mutations. Moreover, the drug has excellent central nervous system penetration. Even so, no clinical response was observed, and the patient succumbed to the disease. The lack of response may be related to the specific nature of the EGFR mutations, and/or other unfavorable tumor biology overriding any benefit from osimertinib.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.164
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenes Chromosomes and CancerSame topicGlioma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207