MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4361282664 · doi:10.20452/pamw.16465

The 3 Wishes Project: toward spiritual care at the end of life

2023· editorial· en· W4361282664 on OpenAlexaff
France Clarke, Thanh H. Neville, Neala Hoad, Anne Boyle, Anne Woods, Joanna C. Dionne, Brittany B. Dennis, Feli Toledo, Benjamin Tam, Marilyn Swinton, Julie C. Reid, Meredith Vanstone

Bibliographic record

VenuePolskie Archiwum Medycyny Wewnętrznej · 2023
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Canadian institutionsSt. Joseph’s Healthcare HamiltonNiagara Health SystemMcMaster UniversityImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnd-of-life careSpiritual carePsychologyBusinessNursingSpiritualityMedicinePalliative careAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

DOI: 10.20452/pamw.16465, Published online: March 29, 2023, Authors: Deborah J. Cook1,2, France J. Clarke2, Thanh H. Neville3, Neala Hoad4, Anne Boyle5, Anne Woods5, Joanna C. Dionne1,2, Brittany B. Dennis1, Feli Toledo6, Benjamin Tam7, Marilyn Swinton2, Julie Reid2, Meredith Vanstone5

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.095

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0090.016
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.020

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePolskie Archiwum Medycyny WewnętrznejSame topicReligion, Spirituality, and PsychologyFrench-language works237,207