MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4361286169 · doi:10.18280/jesa.560107

Photovoltaic Source Powered Shunt Active Power Filter Optimized by Cuckoo Search Algorithm

2023· article· en· W4361286169 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mohamed Khelil Cherfi, Abderrezak Gacemi, Abdelkader Morsli, Abdelhalim Tlemçani

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Quality and Harmonics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCuckoo searchPhotovoltaic systemComputer scienceShunt (medical)Electronic engineeringAlgorithmElectrical engineeringEngineeringMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Non-linear loads such as computers, televisions, arc furnaces, inverters, etc. generates harmonic currents infecting the quality of the power supply and causing damage.To remedy this problem, the shunt active power filter presents the best way to fight against harmonic currents.This paper gives a new technique of shunt active power filter which has tested to be the satisfactory answer to improve energy high-quality in phrases of removing harmonics caused by means of non-linear power loads distribution networks.Our work presents an SAPF powered by a photovoltaic system whose energy control is managed via metaheuristic cuckoo search optimization as the fastest and most reliable optimization unlike traditional strategies like the Perturb and Observe (P&O) algorithm used as the MPPT for PV systems, which gives us a stable power supply to further eliminate harmonics.The simulation on the Matlab Simulink environment truly suggests that the proposed model improves the excellent quality of energy and the control method is efficient and in accordance to the international standard recommendations IEEE 519-1992.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal Européen des Systèmes AutomatisésSame topicPower Quality and HarmonicsFrench-language works237,207