MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Renal osteodystrophy and brown tumours of the jaw associated with tertiary hyperparathyroidism in the context of cystinosis: a case report

2023· article· en· W4361286588 on OpenAlexaff
Shayan Sadeghi, Éric Bissada, Nimaat Pertick

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBiomedical Research and Pathophysiology
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTertiary hyperparathyroidismCystinosisBrown tumorRenal osteodystrophyParathyroidectomySurgeryHyperparathyroidismContext (archaeology)Secondary hyperparathyroidismParathyroid hormoneKidney diseaseInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chronic kidney disease is one of the main manifestations of cystinosis that may lead to hyperparathyroidism. Although head and neck involvement in hyperparathyroidism is rare, lesions can occur in the jaws and cause serious functional handicap. We presented the case of a 24-year-old woman with congenital cystinosis and chronic renal failure complaining from symptomatic expansion of the jawbones. Medical imaging showed radiolucent lesions particularly in anterior hard palate and body of mandible. A diagnosis of renal osteodystrophy and brown tumours related to tertiary hyperparathyroidism was established. Following a subtotal parathyroidectomy and stabilization of parathyroid hormone levels, a conservative mandibular osteoplasty was undertaken to increase the available space for tongue movements. Although non-surgical management remains the primary modality for the treatment of brown tumours, adjunctive surgical approach may be considered in cases of severe functional impairment. It is imperative that underlying systemic imbalances be addressed prior to any maxillofacial intervention to prevent relapse.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0070.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck SurgerySame topicBiomedical Research and PathophysiologyFrench-language works237,207