MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4361290662 · doi:10.18280/jesa.560106

Evaluation of the Variable Component of Truck Travel Time Based on the Maximum Speed for an Optimal Management of the Fleet, Case of Boukhadra Iron Ore Mine, NE Algeria

2023· article· en· W4361290662 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Merah Chafia, Taleb Mounia

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMining Techniques and Economics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTruckIron oreComponent (thermodynamics)Variable (mathematics)Automotive engineeringDuration (music)Travel timeTransport engineeringEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceEngineeringMathematicsMetallurgyMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work focuses on the loading and haulage works which are crucial operations and of major importance for the mining exploitation and whose costs are very high and represent up to 70% of the total price of the entire supply chain production.It is advisable to make a judicious choice of loading and transport machines and to assign them well to limit waiting times and increase yields, which will of course lead to the realization of the planned production.The allocation of trucks and the number assigned to the shovels is an important work for the operator, in this context the present work concerns the open pit mine of Boukhadra (Tebessa), one of the largest iron deposits in Algeria.Based on truck timing data and the characteristics of excavators, trucks, and roads, an analysis of the current status of loading and transport work was made, which showed high waiting times of the shovel.Based on the performance curves of the CATERPILLAR trucks, we determined the appropriate speeds and therefore the determination of the number of trucks necessary to reduce the waiting times of the excavator.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.381

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal Européen des Systèmes AutomatisésSame topicMining Techniques and EconomicsFrench-language works237,207