Evaluation of treatment results of perilunate dislocation by open reduction and repair of the scapholunate ligament
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The study aims to evaluate the treatment results of perilunate dislocations treated with open reduction and scapholunate ligament (SLL) repair. The results showed that the majority of patients had no pain and wrist function was restored well. After surgery, the majority of patients (29 out of 32) had relief from pain. The average wrist motion was 77.93o extensions, 73.69o flexions, and the mean grip strength was 41.35±5.15 kg. which was 93.56% of the normal side. There was 26 excellent, 1 good, and 5 satisfactory results. The average follow-up time was 32.35 months. Surgical procedures included open reduction and SLL repair. The average functional score is 81.30 (very good). Thus, open reduction and SLL repair gave satisfactory results to subacute and acute perilunate dislocations of the wrist. This technique achieved a relatively pain-free wrist with good grip strength and average SL distance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".